Jaw
In the aftermath of joint or muscle stiffness, trauma, injury or surgery on the posterior mandibular or temporomandibular region, quality of life is seriously impacted. The Dynasplint® System helps patients with range of motion challenges in the jaw to improve comfort and accelerate recovery. The innovative Jaw Dynasplint® System can assist with oral challenges including limited vertical range of motion, strengthening, pain-free movement and lateral deviation.
Jaw Dynasplint® System
We designed the Dynasplint® System to increase your range of motion and accelerate your recovery period after surgery, injury or trauma.
Patients who use the Dynasplint System at home, alongside their prescribed home exercise program, experience more consistent progress and are more likely to have a successful rehabilitation experience.
Dynasplint® System
without Counterbalance Bars
Range of Motion/Oral Opening: 9 mm – 50 mm
Dynasplint® System
with Counterbalance Bars
Range of Motion/Oral Opening: 9 mm – 50 mm
Ready to Get Started?
The Jaw Dynasplint® System uses a low-load, prolonged-duration stretch (LLPS) to increase mobility and speed the rehabilitation process. This system is designed to be hands-free using a unique counterbalance system, yet it can also be handheld if preferred. Each Jaw Dynasplint System is fine-tuned with the appropriate force for each patient for the best results and no pain.
Each Jaw Dynasplint System is highly customized by your consultant based on your oral structure, dentition and oral opening. By custom-fitting the mouthpieces, our patients experience exceptional results.
A clinical study found a 53% average reduction in rehabilitation time and cost with the use of the Dynasplint System alongside additional physical therapy. More than one million patients have already benefited from using our systems—join them today!
The Jaw Dynasplint® System can be introduced when the patient has as little as 9mm of oral opening and is intended to be used at home by the patient.
Early application allows patients to accelerate the benefits of Dynasplint as part of a complete home exercise program.
If you are considering surgery, speak to your physician or therapist about obtaining a Dynasplint System proactively so we can help you maximize your results during the early phase of healing and alongside your alongside your post-operative home exercise program.
Head and Neck Cancer
Congenital/Developmental Oral Function Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Trauma
Infection
Head and Neck Surgery
Radiation Therapy
Burns
Scleroderma
Brain Stem Injury
Bruxism (Grinding)
Clenching
Myofascial Pain
Spasms
Stroke
Others
Talk to your doctor to find out if Dynasplint® is right for you.
Stubblefield M, Manfield L, Riedel E “A Preliminary Report on the Efficacy of a Dynamic Jaw Opening Device (Dynasplint Trismus System) as Part of the Multimodal Treatment of Trismus in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer” Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 August; 91(8):1278-82
Shulman D, Shipman B, Willis FB “Treating Trismus with Dynamic Splinting: A Case Report” Journal of Oral Sciences. 2009; 51(1):141-144
Shulman D, Shipman B, Willis FB “Treating Trismus with Dynamic Splinting: A Cohort, Case Series” Advances in Therapy. 2008 January; 25(1):9-16
Harvey L, Herbert R, Crosbie J “Does Stretching Induce Lasting Increases in Joint ROM? A Systematic Review” Physiotherapy Research International. 2002; 7(1):1-13
McClure P, Blackburn L, Dusold C “The Use of Splints in the Treatment of Joint Stiffness: Biologic Rationale and an Algorithm for Making Clinical Decisions” Physical Therapy. 01 Dec 1994; 74(12):18-24
The Jaw Dynasplint® System uses a low-load, prolonged-duration stretch (LLPS) to increase mobility and speed the rehabilitation process. This system is designed to be hands-free using a unique counterbalance system, yet it can also be handheld if preferred. Each Jaw Dynasplint System is fine-tuned with the appropriate force for each patient for the best results and no pain.
Each Jaw Dynasplint System is highly customized by your consultant based on your oral structure, dentition and oral opening. By custom-fitting the mouthpieces, our patients experience exceptional results.
A clinical study found a 53% average reduction in rehabilitation time and cost with the use of the Dynasplint System alongside additional physical therapy. More than one million patients have already benefited from using our systems—join them today!
The Jaw Dynasplint® System can be introduced when the patient has as little as 9mm of oral opening and is intended to be used at home by the patient.
Early application allows patients to accelerate the benefits of Dynasplint as part of a complete home exercise program.
If you are considering surgery, speak to your physician or therapist about obtaining a Dynasplint System proactively so we can help you maximize your results during the early phase of healing and alongside your alongside your post-operative home exercise program.
Head and Neck Cancer
Congenital/Developmental Oral Function Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Trauma
Infection
Head and Neck Surgery
Radiation Therapy
Burns
Scleroderma
Brain Stem Injury
Bruxism (Grinding)
Clenching
Myofascial Pain
Spasms
Stroke
Others
Talk to your doctor to find out if Dynasplint® is right for you.
Stubblefield M, Manfield L, Riedel E “A Preliminary Report on the Efficacy of a Dynamic Jaw Opening Device (Dynasplint Trismus System) as Part of the Multimodal Treatment of Trismus in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer” Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 August; 91(8):1278-82
Shulman D, Shipman B, Willis FB “Treating Trismus with Dynamic Splinting: A Case Report” Journal of Oral Sciences. 2009; 51(1):141-144
Shulman D, Shipman B, Willis FB “Treating Trismus with Dynamic Splinting: A Cohort, Case Series” Advances in Therapy. 2008 January; 25(1):9-16
Harvey L, Herbert R, Crosbie J “Does Stretching Induce Lasting Increases in Joint ROM? A Systematic Review” Physiotherapy Research International. 2002; 7(1):1-13
McClure P, Blackburn L, Dusold C “The Use of Splints in the Treatment of Joint Stiffness: Biologic Rationale and an Algorithm for Making Clinical Decisions” Physical Therapy. 01 Dec 1994; 74(12):18-24
